Attendees
draft-poidt-ccamp-actn-poi-pluggable-02.txt version posted for for IETF-117
Oscar presented the draft to IETF-117.
Nigel posted the draft-davis-ccamp-photonics-plug-arch-00 to add a third way to manage the pluggable routers and presented to IETF-117. Need to check whether the Nigel draft alignment with actn arch.
draft-poidt-ccamp-actn-poi-pluggable-02.txt run for poll to be WG doc.
Fabio Peruzzini still to be added as a contributor
Next call will be regular on Sept. 19th, 2023
OIF to propose a separate channel to manage/control the pluggables (Nigel/Oscar to give more visibility), although this is a 2 years far proposal.
OIF IPRs do not allow to share yet any info on the above matter.
The activity was just announced, we’ll see any further detail on it.
Jeff to warn to keep the solution simple (at least for the moment) so we preserve and lower the iterop issues (that is option 1 and 2).
Jeff clarify He was concerned about the interoperability among the vendors.
Feedbacks on Nigel proposal will come soon (option 3).
Restart the discussion on the Arch and work on the ACTN POI Coherent Module Yang model proposal (between PNC and MDSC). Phil Bedard will make a proposal.
Preliminary Comments on Phil are suggesting to keep a good alignment to IETF models (i/f Yang and TOpology), T-API, and
OpenConfig manifest.
Action is to work with Phil on this direction and make the gap analisys (Daniele and Gab. and Italo action).
Discussion on gap analisys:
Action to All: raise any usecase not yet mentioned in the discussion.
Scope of the draft (e.g. metro, long haul, network configuration, etc.) to be clarified.
Check again on the draft terminology, please add issues in case of modification needed.
Need to open issues on GitHub in order to track the changes.
Open issues in GitHub on the two above statements
Oscar suggested to add some Yang models examples to give an
idea on the draft evolution to ccamp. Unfortunately a real
discussion on this matter is not yet started, We can just present the plans to evolve the draft.
Ways to operate:
Option 2 is the selected one at least for the moment.
In any case there are two steps to follow:
Share the Yang model proposal reasonably before the next call for review (in GitHub)